OPINION: The problem with Scottish agritech isn’t the technology
by Naomi Battison, Business Development Manager and agritech specialist at The National Robotarium. Originally published in The Scottish Farmer on 30 March 2026.
Scottish agriculture is under pressure from every direction at once. Labour is harder to find and retain than at any point in living memory. Margins are tighter. Compliance and audit demands keep growing. Sustainability obligations are tightening. If there was ever a moment when the case for automation was urgent, it’s now.
And yet adoption of robotics across the sector remains frustratingly limited. The temptation is to conclude that farmers aren’t ready. But having spent considerable time with crop and arable farmers, livestock farmers, and potato growers across Scotland, I can tell you that conclusion is wrong. The problem isn’t farmer appetite. It’s that the technology conversation being had around Scottish agriculture bears almost no resemblance to the one farmers actually need.
Ask farmers to identify their highest priorities and the answers are both consistent and specific. Labour dependency for repetitive, skilled tasks like roguing, grading, and animal monitoring. Time lost to manual inspection and paperwork. Cleaning and hygiene risks in sheds. In-field crop monitoring that catches problems before they become yield losses. These are the pressure points. They are also, crucially, areas where deployable robotics and automation solutions already exist: vision-based crop monitoring and disease detection, automated soil sampling, robotic shed cleaning, animal health monitoring, vision-based potato sorting and grading.
The technology isn’t the gap. The gap is that these solutions aren’t reaching farms because they’re being pushed at farmers rather than developed with them, and because the support infrastructure around adoption isn’t built around how farming businesses actually make investment decisions.

Naomi Battison, Business Development Manager and agritech specialist at The National Robotarium
Farmers operating on tight margins and often managing businesses built to support future generations cannot afford speculative technology investments. They need clear evidence that a solution works in Scottish conditions and integrates with current infrastructure. Crucially, they need independent, technically informed advice that helps them navigate the robotics landscape and genuinely de-risk decisions – not a sales pitch. When we asked how adoption decisions are made, the answer was pretty telling. Farmers trust proven examples from peers far more than presentations. That isn’t resistance to change. It’s rational caution when capital decisions affect the long-term viability of the farm.
Which is why I think the most important thing the sector can do right now is get serious about separating near-term reality from blue-sky thinking. The industry talks about robotics in ways that can make the whole agenda feel distant and theoretical. Full automation. Autonomous farm systems. The farm of the future. But the applications I’ve described above aren’t theoretical. They’re available. They’re sitting in catalogues, proven in other markets, waiting for a structured pathway to bring them to Scottish farms.
That pathway requires testing environments that reflect real Scottish agricultural conditions, funding that is genuinely accessible to farming businesses, and honest, independent guidance on what’s deployable today versus what’s still five years away.
Another round of innovation enthusiasm won’t close this gap. A system built around how farmers actually work might.




TechUK






The Engineer













